In May last year, High Court judge Mr Justice Eady, in a preliminary  ruling , held that  Singh's comments were factual assertions  rather    than expressions of opinion - which meant he could not use the defence  of    fair comment.   The Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger  and Lord    Justice Sedley ruled the High Court judge had ''erred in his  approach'' and    allowed Mr Singh's appeal. 
Singh described the ruling as ''brilliant'', but added: ''It is    extraordinary this action has cost £200,000 to establish the meaning  of a    few words.''
Thursday, 1 April 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment