In May last year, High Court judge Mr Justice Eady, in a preliminary ruling , held that Singh's comments were factual assertions rather than expressions of opinion - which meant he could not use the defence of fair comment. The Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger and Lord Justice Sedley ruled the High Court judge had ''erred in his approach'' and allowed Mr Singh's appeal.
Singh described the ruling as ''brilliant'', but added: ''It is extraordinary this action has cost £200,000 to establish the meaning of a few words.''
Saturday Seven Up
19 hours ago

0 comments:
Post a Comment