Sportsman wins appeal against media naming him

A sportsman who obtained an order stopping the media publishing information about his private life today won an appeal against a ruling which would reveal his identity, Press Gazette reports.

The man, referred to in court as JIH, asked a panel of three judges headed by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger, to reverse an earlier ruling by High Court judge Justice Tugendhat.

Lord Neuberger said the sportsman had been in a long-term relationship with another person, referred to as XX. "Since his relationship with XX had started, but before August 2010, a story had been published, without JIH having received any prior notice, suggesting that he had a sexual liaison with another person, who I shall call YY."

"The story whose publication JIH is seeking to prevent concerns an alleged sexual encounter he had with a different person, to whom I shall refer as ZZ, last year."

When JIH discovered that News Group Newspapers intended to publish a story based on information provided by ZZ, he began the present proceedings without revealing his identity.

He also sought an order preventing publication of any information about an alleged sexual relationship with ZZ during his relationship with XX which was served on seven other media companies.

When the matter came before Justice Tugendhat he decided that he was not prepared to make the order, even though NGN had accepted it, without hearing argument.

Lord Neuberger said in the appeal court ruling: "If the media could publish the name of the claimant and the substance of the information which he is seeking to exclude from the public domain, then the whole purpose of the injunction would be undermined, and the claimant's private life many be unlawfully exposed."

He added: "If we permitted JIH's identity to be revealed without permitting the nature of the information of which he is seeking to restrain to be published, then it would nonetheless be relatively easy for the media and members of the public to deduce the nature of that information; it would be a classic, if not very difficult, jigsaw exercise."

Now it's a hat-trick of footballer injunctions

Press Gazette reports that a third England footballer has obtained an injunction banning the reporting of allegations about his private life.
The gagging order was granted on Saturday by on-duty High Court judge Justice Kenneth Parker. This is the third England player in two weeks to be granted an order preventing the media from publishing claims about their personal lives.

England footballer wins privacy gag continuation

An England footballer has won a continuation of a High Court gagging order preventing the "misuse" of private information about him, the BBC reported today.
An injunction blocking publication of allegations about his private life was originally granted to the sportsman on 19 August.
The move came shortly after another England international player was granted a similar court order. The terms of the orders prohibit either of the footballers from being named. The latest ruling was made by Mr Justice Kenneth Parker, sitting in London.
The BBC says that before the proceedings went into private session, Hugh Tomlinson QC, for the footballer, stressed it was not a so-called super-injunction - one which even prevents publication of the fact an injunction has been granted.
He said: "It is an injunction which does not seek to conceal its own identity, but seeks to conceal the identity of the claimant and the defendant because it is an injunction which relates to private information."